Showing posts with label Google+. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Google+. Show all posts

Thursday, August 29, 2013

Geeky Gospels

Hugo Barra, Google's VP for Android left the company to join Chinese mobile phone maker Xiaomi.

Hugo's girlfriend Amanda Rosenberg now officially converted to Sergey Brin's girlfriend.

Sergey Brin is the cofounder of Google. A spokesperson for Brin and his wife Anne Wojcicki had confirmed today that the couple had split but 'remain good friends and partners.' The GLBT community community protested the lighthearted use of the term 'partners'. A divorce is estimated at around $20 billion for this couple.

As a result, now both founders of Google owns an asian lover, officially.

The Chinese media aliken the fiasco to the Wang Lijun - BoGu Kailai - Bo Xilai romance. Mr. Bo is a member of 25 people CCP politburo and the Governor of Chongqing. Wang lijun is the deputy mayor and police chief of Chongqing. BoGu Kailai is the wife of Bo Xilai and lover of Wang Lijun. When the romance went sour, BoGu tried to arrest Wang, and Wang fled to the United State's Consulate in Chengdu. Bo was tried on incompetent leadership as Wang's boss this month in Jinan.

Not every love story had a happy ending. The Supreme Leader Kim Jong-un's ex-girlfriend singer Hyon Song-wol was executed by machine guns with her family members on watch on August 17. Hyon and a number of her colleagues of the Unhasu Orchestra were accused of producing and watching pronographic materials. Kim's wife Ri Sol-ju was also a member of the Unhasu Orchestra.

As it had proved in time, love is a very costly business, sometimes fatally dangerous.

Saturday, June 15, 2013

Western Infiltration of Chinese Infrastructure

Many of Snowden's revelations and claims are shocking to the public, not because they were anything new, but because of the reason laid out in the letter from Senators to the NSA: the gap between the understanding of Americans and the interpretation of law of the administration. At the end of the day, the mass scale surveillance over American citizens would probably be found legal.

Snowden also confirmed that the US had been hacking into infrastructure in China. This would not be news for the Chinese government. In 1989, after the Tian'anmen Square Slaughter, Chinese officials found dead tone when they picked up their phones, and was surprised to know all western companies and embassies had normal communications to the outside world. That made a legitimate argument for building China's own communication infrastructure, thus ZTE and Huawei.

For some people who are not sure about the information you can extract from phone records (minus the actual contents), with modern data mining techniques, the government will know more about you then a particular conversation. With very similar surveillance but on much primitive methods, former Chongqing police chief Mr. Wang Lijun, who defected to the US consulate in Chengdu for a few days before surrendered the to central government in Beijing, boasted a 128 degrees of surveillance over each individual who had ever set foot in Chongqing. The system was deployed to fight political enemies of his boss Bo Xilai, then Party Boss of Chongqing. Both Bo and Wang were arrested.

American's wary eyes on China are not always unappreciated. The red regime never knew how much irrigation land it had, until a folder of geo-sensing image was passed from the US as a neighborly gesture in the 1970s.

An interesting question would be whether Google would withdraw from the US market, given their previous statement over the rationale of withdrawing from the mainland China market all together. By all means, the government intrusion into individual privacy is way more penetrative and aggressive on the US side.

Google published a map of number of requests to censor certain data from the governments around the globe. What was unsaid in the map was that fact that the US government had unlimited direct access to its servers, a fact Google had fiercely denied until the Snowden Revelation. NSA have been mining directly on servers of nine major companies including Google, Apple, Facebook, Microsoft, etc. Thousands other smaller companies provide user data voluntarily in exchange of favorable treatments by the NSA. In the case of Microsoft, it even provides information on its system bugs and loopholes to the NSA before it release patches to patch them.

The fiasco should bring back memory from a 1998 movie, the Enemy of the State. For a long time, even computation scientists had been speculating the data accumulated by the NSA had surpassed its processing capability. However, based on the information made available after the Snowden incident, almost everyone had underestimated the computing capacity of NSA.

Both Snowden and Manning came from the state of Maryland.

On the other hand, it might be a pragmatical choice for American people not worried about the NSA. After all, general public are not worthy targets for NSA. It's a golden opportunity for the Americans to reflect on the invasion of privacy by the Internet, in particular social networks such as Facebook, Google, Twitter, etc. Their potential employers had much more interests to dig out any bad jokes or shirtless pictures they posted half a century ago in middle schools.

Wednesday, March 27, 2013

Neil Fraser's Vietnam Problem

Google's Neil Fraser took a trip in Vietnam, where he was surprised to find computer science had been incorporated into public school curricula, despite severe resource constraints. In Vietnam, pils start learning computer science from second grade. They started real programming in their 4th grade. Where Neil made a comparison to students in the US struggling on HTML img tags, by 'students in the US', Neil was referring to 11th grade 'gifted and talented' students enrolled in magnet program in science and mathematics.

Intuitively, Neil was curious on what would a 11th grade Vietnamese student do for programming. He walked into a random school's programming class. This is the problem he found. Students have 45 minutes to design and work out a solution with PASCAL. Nearly all students in that classroom completed on time.

Google's recruitment team rated this question top one third. Neil estimated at least half of those students would pass Google interview.

This is a sad day. The Seagull estimate that in any college level computer science class at any university (with few exceptions such as MIT, CMU and Stanford) around the world, at most 10-20% 3rd year computer science students will be able to finish the task in 45 minutes. If his observance is accurate, then Neil's careless walk may have proved all the education in CS has been all wrong. In other words, as in the learning process of any other natural spoken language, it should be started in a child's early age.

Although an adult can learn a foreign language, it usually takes way longer time, and most likely will never reach the point he will be able to use it naturally. If it is not a natural process, it is hard. And that is what we have seen most computer science students doing in college, and in their programmer career: floundering and withering.

The question is actually a well known problem among programming enthusiasms. It is a variation of an ACM programming contest archive, maintained by the University of Valladolid in Spain, aka UVA 705 Slash Maze. There are some more involved solutions available from Google, but here is a most elegant solution with the Vietnamese problem's data file.


/* 
 * Vietnamese Problem - Neil Fraser - 11th Grade - Rosemont
 */
#include <iostream>
#include <fstream>

const int row(17);
const int col(25);
bool goal(true);
int count(0);

using namespace std;

void cal(char** mat, int i, int j) {
  if (mat[i][j] != '1') {
    mat[i][j] = '1';
    if ((i==0)||(i==row-1)||(j==0)||(j==col-1)) goal = false;
    if (goal) count++;
    if ( (i!=0)&&(j!=col-1) && (mat[i-1][j+1]!='1') ) cal(mat, i-2, j+2);
    if ( (i!=0)&&(j!=0) && (mat[i-1][j-1]!='1') ) cal(mat, i-2, j-2);
    if ( (i!=row-1)&&(j!=0) && (mat[i+1][j-1]!='1') ) cal(mat, i+2, j-2);
    if ((i!=row-1)&&(j!=col-1) && (mat[i+1][j+1]!='1')) cal(mat, i+2, j+2);
  }
}

int main() {

  int maxarea = 0;
  char **mat = new char* [row];
  for (int i=0; i<row; i++) mat[i] = new char[col];

  ifstream fin("data1.txt");
  for (int i=0; i<row; i++)
    for (int j=0; j> mat[i][j];
  fin.close();

  for (int i=0; i<row; i++)
    for (int j=0; j<col; j++)
      if ( (i%2==0) && (j%2==0) && !( (i%4==0) && (j%4==0) ) ) {
        cal(mat, i, j);
        if (count > maxarea) maxarea = count;
        count = 0, goal = true;
      }

  for (int i=0; i<row; i++) delete[] mat[i];
  delete [] mat;
  cout << "the largest enclosed area is: " << maxarea/2 << endl;
}

data.txt:

1000000010001000100000001
0100000100010100010000010
0010001000100010001000100
0001010001000001000101000
1000100010001000100010000
0100000100010001010001000
0010001000100010001000100
0001010001000100000100010
0000100010001000000010001
0001000101000100000101000
0010001000100010001000100
0100010000010001010000010
1000100010001000100010001
0100000101000001000100010
0010001000100010001000100
0001010000010100010001000
0000100000001000100010000

Wednesday, November 02, 2011

Chinese search engine Baidu bragged about its 'Testing on Toilet' Knock-off

The official Chinese search engine Baidu bragged about its 'Testing on Toilet (TOTT)' project, where intriguing thoughts or projects were posted in the bathroom for employees to 'digest, an idea piloted by Google about 5 years ago.

Well, they might be too used to copying & pasting in their cubicles, that couldn't help to do the same when releasing themselves, as revealed by this Biadu TOTT dated 10/12/2011. Notice the Google logo at the bottom right corner.

Although Baidu, as the official search provider endorsed by the Chinese propaganda department, dominant Chinese Internet search market and had chased Google out of mainland China, boasting its 'secure' searching algorithm that could filter out any information not favored by the Communists Party, its technical capability ran into a major embarrassment when Google shut down its own 'sensitive words' filter after getting afoul with the Chinese authority and instantaneously Baidu's search results were populated with forbidden topics such as the Massacre at Tian'anmen Square in 1989. It is evident that for all the time, Baidu's 'advanced' searching product had been piggybacking on Google.

source via solid_dot

Thursday, July 21, 2011

Google Cut Firefox Support

Google announced that it would stop updating its Firefox Toolbar, a very popular product among FireFox users.

Google had been lending its hand to the opensource browser project by contributing a big donation in exchange of a place at Firefox's integrated search block. In the darkest days while Firefox was struggling to catch up with Microsoft's Internet Explorer, that was the major source for the by and large community based project.

Fast forwarding to summer of 2011. Google released its own browser 'Chrome' and IE's market has been cut in half. It is obvious that Firefox is the major obstacle on Google's way to take over the browser battlefield. Because enemy's enemy must be a friend, Google Toolbar now exclusively support IE. It is not surprising to see Google back stab once partner, but you will wonder where had Google buried the 'Don't be Evil' slogan.

Well, actually, if you look carefully, 'Don't be Evil' is nowhere to be found in Google's official documentation. What a myth.

Friday, July 15, 2011

Google Plus

Readers of the Seagull Reference can connect to Big Brother Chang through Google+. Send theseagullbog@gmail.com an email if you need an invitation.

Friday, July 01, 2011

China to Acquire Chunk of Facebook

Business Insider reported China was in process of acquiring huge chuck of Facebook. One source indicated a fund was hired to buy stocks of Facebook from former employees, and another source traced to Citibank, whom was in talk to acquiring as much as $1.2 billion representing a sovereign wealth fund of China.

The leads coincident with Facebook showing attention of entering Chinese market. Mark Zuckerberg visited China at the end of last year to meet senior officials there. It is rumored Facebook might work with its knock-off brand as a form acceptable to Chinese censorship requirement. While it looks if China feel comfortable on its influence with sizable Facebook stocks, the company might be granted the entrance as an exception. As of today, Facebook is blocked in mainland China. Google's attempt on social network Google+ was blocked within hours after it was launched.

Saturday, May 14, 2011

Facebook's Falling Path

History does repeat itself. Yahoo's struggle started with it's infamous 3721 team, which equated Yahoo a nickname of largest malware warehouse in Chinese online world. Years later, Facebook is appending itself to Yahoo's falling path in China by tying itself with Baidu, the infamous official sponsored search engine which drew Google out of Chinese market.

Any reader with knowledge of Mark Zuckerberg's personal talk with Baidu's founder Li Yanhong should not be surprised when Facebook's secret smear campaign against Google was uncovered. Facebook's mission of beating Google to a moral new low is bound to be a fool's errand.

Thursday, March 31, 2011

Ethics in IT Companies

Microsoft rejected EFF's accusation that it had intendedly closed the encrypted connection channel in his HOTMAIL email service in countries with political contentions between the people and the government. The areas where HTTPS, an encrypted communication protocol, were shut shown by Microsoft's Hotmail include Bahrain, Iran, Sudan among a few others.

Microsoft's move was viewed by many as a calculated step made to appease autocratic regimes so that they could use eavesdropping software to monitor politically sensitive messages. When users of Hotmail use HTTPS, they would receive a notice which says, 'your Windows ID can't use HTTPS because .. account type'. EFF pointed out a trick that the user could easily turn on the feature by selecting a county not effected in the account setting, for example, Japan or Canada.

IT companies often face the dilemma between making profit and user protection. Yahoo knowingly volunteered user information to Beijing's communist regime resulted in lengthy jail time for its users. Google set up servers in China for Chinese market so that they could be technically monitored. Cisco helped the secret police to develop China's Internet traffic monitoring system. Their track record is so bad that everyone question their real intention even when it seems someone is trying to do the right thing. Last year, when Google announced they would stopped filtering search result in China, they were not welcomed, but accused of advancing business in disguise of political messages. They accusers were not disappointed when it turned out that Google never stopped filtering 'sensitive words' in China, although they claimed they had acted.

Monday, March 21, 2011

Google's Croporate Culture Questioned on Online Behavior of One Employee

An online ID 'wolver' who self-identified as a Google employee scolded another online ID of the MITBBS for sharing her interview experience at Google. 'Wolver' accused the ID for violating the NDA clause, in particular the interview questions, and threatened to report the incident to Google's Human Resource unless he is offered 'a reason'.

The wolver's action triggered a heated discussion, where some praised his action as a loyal employee, many thought it an overreaction because similar information were abundant in many websites such as careercup, even in many published books. MIT even has a course in which Google interview questions are deconstructed and analyzed.

The discussion went awry when many discussed wolver's originality (a typical troll question in Chinese forums), and many found it unsurprising that 'wolver' was "born and raised in Shanghai". Some questioned the necessity for 'wolver' to write in both languages, English first, and Chinese translation follows in a paragraph by paragraph fashion. Many light jokes and laughers made this subject a most talked about topic (a 'mega water drain' in BBS terminology) on the popular online forum, but soon it became obvious that the incident was potentially a serious matter with deep implications.

It could be a textbook offense of Policy 55. Some suspected whether 'wolver's writing to the interviewee had been authorized by his employer and whether it amounted to work place sexual harassment (as the original poster was a female) against a younger and lower ranked female employee. Some expressed concern over 'wolver's bragging of his intimate relationship with some at Google's human resource department, and doubt whether that's a healthy organizational culture.

Some questioned whether the entire company is so obsessed with self righteousness to the extend of being pretentious. The most frequent word seen in related discussions was zhuangbility. While one ID identified as a Google employee expressed dismay of having a co-worker like 'wolver', many outsiders suggested 'wolver' represented a corporate culture of zhuangbility at Google.

From a legal point of view, some readers believed 'wolver' had already committed a crime in the form of blackmailing, citing following threat, 'so please give me a reason why I should not report you to the HR and rescind your offer immediately.' Some believed 'Wolver' intentionally backed up his threat while bragging his personal ties with HR personnels. Wolver's characterization of his connections with HR personnels as 'friends' instead of 'colleagues' is criminally damaging, because it substantiated the threat behind his demand in the message to the female interviewee, 'give me a reason why I should not report you'. The 'shock and awe' choice to use a public letter instead of utilizing the (often conceived mild and more benign) 'private message' channel of the online forum might reflect a calculated intention to pragmatically create a high pressure to force the interviewee to fulfill wolver's demand in a rush without fully assessing the situation. In replying other's question, Wolver hinted, 'I am giving her a chance'. A prosecutor would not need much imagination to figure out what had Wolver been expecting.

The true identity of the Google employee was not clear at this time. However, while some suspect the person's name is Cong Yu, a New York City based research scientist at Google, Cong Yu, using online ID 'tntt' posted on the forum that he knew the true identify of 'wolver', but he decided not to provide further information. Some suspect Cong Yu was indeed 'wolver' himself.
wolver (没有) 于 (Sat Mar 19 15:12:23 2011, 美东) 提到:

同学,

(这是关于你的置顶文章, 本来因该私人信件的,但是给后来者一个警告也好)

First, you should know that you have signed an NDA with Google at the beginning of the on-site interview and things that were said and discussed during the interview (particularly the interview questions) were covered under the NDA.

第一,你应该知道你面试的时候签过NDA,所有面试过程中说的都是覆盖的,尤其是这些面试题目。

Second, you are already doing damages to Google before you even started. Once those interview questions are disclosed on high traffic sites such as here, they will be immediately banned as interview questions, which puts extra burdens on the engineers and the HR team to come up with alternative good questions.

第二,这些题目,一旦在流量大的网站上泄密了,内部就会被禁掉,需要大量的精力去制作新的考题。

Google has a very open culture and therefore also a very high expectation of how employees should behave with regard to confidentiality. Any leak is a just cause for firing immediately (just search for "Google Fires Employee Who Leaked Memo On Raises")

Google的文化是很开放的,员工知道很多在别的公司不会知道的事。正因为如此,Google对保密很重视,任何泄密都可以立刻炒掉。

So, please give me a reason why I should not report you to the HR and rescind your offer immediately. NYC site is not as big as MTV and I don't think it will take long to find out who you are after HR is notified.

所以,请你给我一个理由,为什么我不应该立刻把你报告给人力资源部。纽约的分部并不大,你是两月16号面试的,而且知道你的所有的题目和面试人员的特征,我想很快可以找到。

========
wolver (没有) 于 (Sat Mar 19 16:56:27 2011, 美东) 提到:

请勿须操心,我和几个HR的人交往很多,都是好几年的朋友了

========
wolver (没有) 于 (Sat Mar 19 17:34:26 2011, 美东) 提到:

I am giving her a chance.

========
wolver (没有) 于 (Sat Mar 19 20:02:58 2011, 美东) 提到:

谢谢提醒,我想HR知道应该怎么做的。

我的职责也不过是告诉HR有这么一件事,至于下面怎么回事就不是我能管的了。HR懂中文很多,不用我来翻译的。
========
发信人: icecool1748 (ICE), 信区: JobHunting
标 题: Re: 有人有备份吗?
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Sun Mar 20 10:47:09 2011, 美东)

我看丫h1b才8万多的base,让我很shock,真是奴才命主子的责任感。

--
※ 来源:·BBS 未名空间站 海外: mitbbs.com 中国: mitbbs.cn·[FROM: 208.94.]

========
发信人: thex (耗子), 信区: JobHunting
标 题: Re: job版那个傻逼已经被人肉出来啦,大家快去看 (转载)
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Sun Mar 20 12:11:07 2011, 美东)

【 以下文字转载自 Military 讨论区 】
发信人: thex (耗子), 信区: Military
标 题: Re: job版那个傻逼已经被人肉出来啦,大家快去看
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Sun Mar 20 12:10:46 2011, 美东)

其实这个家伙也怪可怜的,google的风格就是装B. 公司做生意,码工干活挣工资都是人之常情。结果google和里面的员工都出来装B。

google装B被土共一下子打回原形。这个wolfer咋办啊?!凭他的脸蛋出来裸奔个高清我认为大家就应该放手给他个重新做人的机会。
--
※ 来源:·WWW 未名空间站 中国: mitbbs.cn 海外: mitbbs.com·[FROM: 24.16.]

========
发信人: malan (三民主义救中国), 信区: JobHunting
标 题: 从不认为google是什么非常好的选择。
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Sun Mar 20 04:56:43 2011, 美东)

看了这种2B,更坚定了这个想法。
--
※ 来源:·WWW 未名空间站 中国: mitbbs.cn 海外: mitbbs.com·[FROM: 184.190.]

========
发信人: tuxedos (tuxedos), 信区: JobHunting
标 题: 古歌这种公司
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Sun Mar 20 03:08:30 2011, 美东)

不断在走下坡路啊,search market share不断下降,盈利产品单一,经营目标转为推广所谓民主,员工自以为是. 真是烂啊....
--
※ 来源:·WWW 未名空间站 中国: mitbbs.cn 海外: mitbbs.com·[FROM: 71.227.]

========
发信人: astro (桃谷六仙@英俊中年), 信区: JobHunting
标 题: 这个 wolver 不单是被fire的问题,应该进监狱
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Sat Mar 19 21:26:31 2011, 美东)

看看it说的,典型的blackmail 啊。去wiki上随便一翻,blackmail是 up to one year in prison.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blackmail#United_States_law

准备请律师吧。

So, please give me a reason why I should not report you to the HR and rescind your offer immediately. NYC site is not as big as MTV and I don't think it will take long to find out who you are after HR is notified.

所以,请你给我一个理由,为什么我不应该立刻把你报告给人力资源部。纽约的分部并不大,你是两月16号面试的,而且知道你的所有的题目和面试人员的特征,我想很快可以找到。

--
云山苍苍,江水泱泱,先生之风,山高水长.
※ 来源:·WWW 未名空间站 中国: mitbbs.cn 海外: mitbbs.com·[FROM: 98.229.]

========
发信人: bixu1 (2-39), 信区: JobHunting
标 题: Re: 大家好,事件澄清
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Sun Mar 20 17:35:06 2011, 美东)

wolver

考虑用户发帖版面信息

排名 疑似马甲 IP相似分 发贴版面相似分 总分
1 cadreaming 0.759835685652 0.856620911317 2.06161796064
2 jzxdjzxb 0.854574012792 0.405461449839 1.54756764924
3 monzonite 0.67684772829 0.612808133186 1.50640331394
4 rossby 0.681590457749 0.496013946834 1.35774720389
5 tntttt 0.583272585263 0.533617277387 1.20576124311
--
※ 来源:·WWW 未名空间站 中国: mitbbs.cn 海外: mitbbs.com·[FROM: 204.197.]

Friday, February 11, 2011

Quotes


Google's Egyptian executive was released from jail. Wael Ghonim had been accused of being 'unpatriotic' by the authority. Ghonim said, 'every person with a kind heart are seen as unpatriotic, because evil is the norm in this nation.' Ghonim wailed at the death of protesters, 'I want to apologize to every family who lost their son, although it is not our faulty. It is the fault of this administration who grasp the government.'

Egyptian Protesters, "An administration who is afraid of Facebook and Twitter should look for a farm to rule, and leave the country alone."

Wednesday, February 02, 2011

Classics Faces Off GFW

Google's newly released Art Project joined millions others to be blocked by the communists' Great FireWall. The Google Art Project partnered with 17 top museums across the world to bring a surreal browsing experience to users in front of a computer, when they can view famous exhibits in the museum setting with unprecedented resolution. Each view is comprised of billions of pixels, or 1000 times more in detail then a consumer's digital camera. These paintings include master pieces by artists such as Van Gogh, and you would wonder what did Van Gogh did to deserve a ban in modern China.

The inspectors, or Net Cops as they are referred in China, had very unique and peculiar taste in making decisions regards which sites got blocked. For example, python.org, the main official portal for the Python programming language has been famously blocked for years. Do they not like the big snake logo? Or they were offended by Monty Python the show where the programming language got its name? Everyone is curious, but no one can tell.

Other websites blocked? Wikipedia, Youtube, Picasa, Pbase, Flickr, Twitter, ....

Happy Chinese New Year!

Friday, January 15, 2010

More Convincing Theory Behind Google's Pull Out

What The Seagull suspected earlier turned out to be more than imagination. Seagull Reference was possibly the first to point to abusing of CALEA backdoor to be the cause of Google's outrage. Today there is proof.

Computer World cited 'a source familiar with the situation' to reveal an 'internal intercept system' of Google, which spy on its own EMail data to comply to legal requests from authorities. No wonder they were able to pinpoint China, because Chinese must be using their affiliated accounts when they wandered around. This echoes the description of the alleged 'comprise' of the said accounts: only account info and EMail titles, but not EMail contents.

In other words, Google's stun was a combined result of embarrassment, rage and an urge of denial.

Wednesday, January 13, 2010

Google to Pull Out from China

Google's Chief Legal Officer David Drummond blogged yesterday afternoon that Google had been fed up with China's cyber-censorship and 'attacks' on Google's 'infrastructure' in order to access GMail users who advocate for human rights, and that Google was to pull out from China entirely.

When the words broke out, the first instinctive guess was that the Chinese government must have used their CALEA password in such careless ways that amounted to annoying. The blog didn't say so, rather denied any compromise of Google server contents.

The idea sounds wonderful as Google is the first big boy on the street bother to challenge the bullying communist China on its own citizens. The timing is troublesome, at least in a degree. All governments do cyber scouting and so does China. If the said 'attack' was originated from Chinese police, what makes it newsworthy to Google?

There must be incidents and deal-makings behind the curtain that Google decides not interesting enough to write about. For example, a State Department meeting hosted by Hillary Clinton, attended by Google's founders and top execs. Secretary Clinton herself will be giving an address next week on the centrality of Internet freedom.

Google was widely praised, and by and large has been practicing, their motto of 'Do not be Evil'. The moral highland was most recently damaged by Google's decision to provide the 2.1 version of its 'open-source' Andriod operating system to Taiwan's HTC exclusively.

Friday, July 31, 2009

Civil Rights Lawyer Detained


Lawyer Mr. Zhiyong Xu was detained by police. His name was blacklisted by the CCP's propaganda branch. Searching for his name in Google Chinese returns a message saying the search term contains illegal words.

Mr. Xu represented victims of Sanlu Milk.

Friday, May 23, 2008

3 Minutes of Silence


The above graph representing usage of Google's Chinese search engine was revealed by Fang Kun, an engineer of the Google Product Engineering Institute in China, on his blog.

Chinese all the world observed a three minutes of silence on 14:28 May 19, 2008, a week from the struck of the deadliest earthquake in 30 years which claimed more than 50,000 victims in the south western Sichuan province.

Tuesday, May 29, 2007

High School Students in a Harmonic Society

While the official theme of the Chinese society is 'harmonic', the nation was shocked watching a YouTube video depicting high school students walking around in class while mocked, ridiculed and hit an ailing teacher.

The incident happened at a vocation training high school, Beijing Haidian Art Vocation High School. While most kids in large cities go to college, this type of schools offer opportunities for the few who don't. Nevertheless, the scene where a teacher was abused by students were so shocking that thousands, and perhaps millions of Chinese Netizens used Internet to show their shock and anger. Some offered bound for physical discipline of the kids involved, and some went to the school to confront the principle. An online forum dedicated to discussion of the incident was set up. Local medias sent reporting groups to the school, and local police patrolled the school.

A formal student of teacher Li wrote:
孙老师,您还好吗?

哭着看完了那段不想再看第二遍的视频,心理十分复杂。孙老师~~您现在还好吗?我是您在清河中学时候的学生,您教了我三年。孙老师是一个精通地理和历史的老实人,从来没有和我们发过脾气,红过脸,有什么问题老师总是把责任自己承担起来。转眼已经将近10年了,我也从一个小毛孩变成了大人,有了自己的家庭,毕业后我们还曾经回去看过您,可是听说您已经离开了那个学校,这么多年过去了,万万没有想到会以这样的方式再次看到您,得到您的消息,您还站在讲台前,继续着您的事业,服装没有改变,口音没有改变,还是和当年一样,记得我上学时候您就已经退休,后来是返聘回来继续给我们教书,我们也知道您的家庭有一些困难,还需要您这些微薄的收入来支撑,一位70的老人,本应该享受天伦之乐,安度晚年的,现在确没有得到您应该享受的内容,反而被推倒了风头浪尖,希望大家,包括媒体,包括学校,所有人不要再去给这么一位可敬的老人再增加压力,为难老人,让老人能享受一下真正的晚年,媒体记者,你们多关心一下老人家里的困境,为什么70岁的老人,现在还要出来教书,帮孙老师解决一下家里实际困难好不好。不要再为难孙老师了。真没有想到一群乳臭未干小毛孩居然如此对待年已70的老师。你们还是人吗,你们有爷爷,姥爷吗?你是真么对待你的长辈吗?你们的父母是怎么教育你们的!借用郭德刚的一句话:要不是法律不允许,我早打死你们了!
.


The news was first blocked in China as it's against the harmonic society the CCP advocating. Then it was uploaded to the YouTube, a popular website and a Google subsidiary out of control of the CCP. It occupied many YouTube rankings in no time, including No. 1 most viewed Chinese and No. 1 most viewed film and animation, and many others. However, YouTube/Google's handling of the event is equally remarkable then the event itself. Although the video claimed 330 thousands clicks and 3 thousands comments in 3 days while occupying more than 2 dozens of YouTube 'honors'. It was taken off the cover page of 'most viewed' videos so that people who wondered into YouTube won't be able to see it.

Although it's clearly an embarrassment of the collapse of education system on moral values, the incident is nowhere close to the Tiananmen massacre or a scandal of government bureaucracy. For many concerned, it's such a chilling revelation that YouTube is collaborating with the CCP propaganda department in building the harmonic society online.

Monday, November 13, 2006

Moment of Truth in Communism Propaganda


Recently a Chinese propaganda official told the press that Chinese enjoyed the most freedom of speech as most western website did not allow readers to leave comments while most Chinese website did. Probably so.

Look at this Youtube video on the high profile L.A. police brutality. Even though Youbute does allow visitors to leave comments, actually visitors comments are what makes Youbute the $1.6 billion business, the comment function of this particular heavily visited video is disabled.

Internet has become a main Chinese for Chinese to release their unhappiness on social issues. It seems the government intentionally leaves the channel open so that less people will actually go on the streets. Thanks to cheap labor cost, thousands of Net cops were busy working to delete inappropriate comments. Still, Chinese Netizens get to enjoy moment of shout out on the Internet. On the other hand, although Google's video sharing business model is built on community comments, Google decides it's simply too risky to allow any potential criticism on government that they prohibit comments on sensitive topics. Or maybe, 'censorship' is just too evil a word for Google's taste, and 'shut up' sounds much nicer.

Stated in Google's own Code of Conduct, "..our most important asset by far is our reputation as a company that warrants our users' faith and trust." Google made its name and market share not only by its technically superior search engine, but also because of its 'being different kind of company', evident by clean user interface, and non-commercial rankings of search results, etc. However, the core value of Google has been put into test repeatedly as the company 'evolves'. So one day it may read 'All animals are equal', and the next day it may evolves into '.., but some animals are more equal then others'.

Just another case when the Mafia Nation is laughing at the Police Nation. Google, "Don't be Evil!"